Skip to main content

New Study Sheds Light on Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Keywords
Categories

Non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) can significantly increase the risk of amputations, posing a major challenge in clinical practice. While hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has shown potential as an adjunct to standard wound care (SWC), its impact on reducing amputation rates remains controversial. A recent study in Cureus aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining HBOT with SWC compared to SWC alone in patients with DFUs.1

This prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 60 adult patients with DFUs. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving adjuvant HBOT with SWC (n=30) and the other receiving SWC alone (n=30).1 The HBOT protocol involved 24 sessions (six each week) at 3.0 absolute atmospheric pressure for 45 minutes over four weeks. Outcomes assessed by the researchers included wound size reduction, wound bed condition, complications, and incidence of amputation, with follow-up evaluations at four weeks.1

Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain, wound size, and inflammation compared to baseline (p<0.001).1 However, the HBOT plus SWC group showed superior outcomes, including greater wound size reduction, healthier granulation tissue formation, and lower rates of minor amputations (all p=0.001). The safety profile was comparable between the groups, with no significant differences in complications (p=0.198).1

In conclusion, the authors found that in their study, the addition of HBOT to SWC enhanced healing in DFUs and significantly reduced minor amputation rates without increasing complications. These findings support integrating HBOT as an adjunct in non-healing DFU management, offering healthcare professionals a potential option for improving patient outcomes.

Reference

1. Myrthong AL, Gurav S, Mahankudo S, et al. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Combined With Standard Wound Care Versus Standard Wound Care Alone in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Prospective Comparative Study. Cureus 2024;16(12):e74964. doi:10.7759/cureus.74964

The views and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the contributor, and do not represent the views of WoundSource, HMP Global, its affiliates, or subsidiary companies.